Effect of consumer reconstitution practices on acetaminophen concentration in sachet formulations: Pilot study

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Yessin Mokni
Nesrine Zitouni
Kaouther Zribi
Sarra Berriri
Fethi Safta

Abstract

Background: Single-dose powder sachets are used to overcome solubility limitations of several actives such as acetaminophen. After reconstitution,residual deposits and sedimentation may reduce the delivered dose.
Objectives: Develop and validate a rapid assay for acetaminophen quantification in sachet preparations and evaluate consumer reconstitution practices to generate provisional, product-specific recommendations.
Methods: Prospective pilot study on four commercial sachet products. Twenty-eight volunteers (7 per product) simulated preparation and administration. Studied preparation variables were: reconstitution volume (mL) and stirring time (s). An aliquot of each preparation was analyzed by the validated chromatography (HPLC) method. Correlation coefficients between measured concentrations and preparation variables were calculated. Product-specific predictive models were generated for variables showing significant association. Optimal reconstitution conditions were estimated from these models.
Results: Inter-individual variability was large: SD(volume) = 27.76 mL; SD(stirring time) = 8.98 s. Recovered concentrations ranged from 59.4% to 99.7% of the predicted value; only 4/28 preparations reached ≥97.5% of expected concentration. Product-specific optimal conditions calculated were — Product 1: stir 37 s, volume 90 mL; Product 2: volume 178 mL, stir 7 s; Product 3: stir 11 s, volume 64 mL.
Conclusion: In this exploratory pilot, consumer reconstitution of acetaminophen sachets produced substantial variability and frequent under-delivery. The validated HPLC assay enabled derivation of provisional, product-specific reconstitution parameters.

Keywords:

Acetaminophen, Reconstitution, High-performance liquid chromatography, Medication safety

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

References

  1. AMMs par DCI [Internet]. 2025 [cited 2025 Apr 21]. Available from: http://www.dpm.tn/index.php/medicaments-a-usage-humain/
  2. amms-par-dci
  3. De Sutter AI, Eriksson L, van Driel ML. Oral antihistamine-decongestant-analgesic combinations for the common
  4. cold. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jan 21;1(1):1. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD004976.pub4 PubMed PMID: 35060618;
  5. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8780136.
  6. Bouden S, Abid Y, Rouached L, Tekaya AB, Mahmoud I, Tekaya R,et al. Self-medication with analgesics in rheumatology: Frequency
  7. and associated factors. Tunis Med. 2025;103(12). doi:10.62438/ tunismed.v103i12.5918
  8. Controlling the Stability of Medicinal Suspensions[Internet]. [cited 2026 May 4]. Available from: https://www.
  9. americanpharmaceuticalreview.com/Featured-Articles/331619- Controlling-the-Stability-of-Medicinal-Suspensions/
  10. Nguyen D, Secretan PH, Auvity S, Vidal F, Postaire M, Cisternino S, et al. Assessment of practices for suspended oral drugs by
  11. tablet crushing in pediatric units. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2020 Dec;157:175–82. doi:10.1016/j.ejpb.2020.10.013 PubMed PMID:
  12. Ménétré S, Weber M, Socha M, Le Tacon S, May I, Schweitzer C, et al. Préparation et administration des médicaments dans les services de pédiatrie. Évaluation des pratiques des soignants. Archives de Pédiatrie. 2018 Apr 1;25(3):3. doi:10.1016/j.arcped.2017.12.002
  13. Hubert Ph, Chiap P, Crommen J, Boulanger B, Chapuzet E, Mercier N, et al. The SFSTP guide on the validation of chromatographic
  14. methods for drug bioanalysis: from the Washington Conference to the laboratory. Analytica Chimica Acta. 1999 May 31;391(2):2.
  15. doi:10.1016/S0003-2670(99)00106-3
  16. ICH Q2(R2) Validation of analytical procedures - Scientific guideline| European Medicines Agency (EMA) [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2025
  17. Apr 21]. Available from: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/ich-q2r2-validation-analytical-procedures-scientific-guideline
  18. Hubert P, Nguyen-Huu JJ, Boulanger B, Chapuzet E, Chiap P, Cohen N,et al. Harmonization of strategies for the validation of quantitative analytical procedures. A SFSTP proposal--Part I. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2004 Nov 15;36(3):3. doi:10.1016/j.jpba.2004.07.027
  19. PubMed PMID: 15522533.
  20. Kumarasinghe M,Weerasinghe MC. Reconstitution of oral antibiotic suspensions for paediatric use in households: a cross-sectional
  21. study among caregivers of 3-5-year-old children from a selected district, Sri Lanka. BMC Pediatr. 2024 Apr 4;24(1):1. doi:10.1186/
  22. s12887-024-04725-y PubMed PMID: 38575910; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC10996081.
  23. Berthe-Aucejo A, Girard D, Lorrot M, Bellettre X, Faye A, Mercier JC, et al. Evaluation of frequency of paediatric oral liquid medication
  24. dosing errors by caregivers: amoxicillin and josamycin. Arch Dis Child. 2016 Apr;101(4):4. doi:10.1136/archdischild-2015-309426
  25. PubMed PMID: 26729746.
  26. Sonji GM, Sonji NM, Boukhary R, Hodeib F, Majzoub MS, Assi M. Caregiver Views and Practices Regarding Children’s Antibiotic
  27. Suspensions in Lebanon. Jordan Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2025 Mar 25;18(1):90–103. doi:10.35516/jjps.v18i1.2495
  28. World Health Organization. WHO pictograms. Geneva: WHO; 2009.
  29. Idriss-Wheeler D, Ormel I, Assefa M, Rab F, Angelakis C, Yaya S, et al. Engaging Community Health Workers (CHWs) in Africa: Lessons
  30. from the Canadian Red Cross supported programs. PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Jan 18;4(1):1. doi:10.1371/journal.pgph.0002799
  31. PubMed PMID: 38236795; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC10796059.