Predictive Value of the REMIND Endoscopic Score for Clinical Recurrence After Ileocolic Resection in Crohn's Disease

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Amal Jerbi
Abdelwahab Nakhli
Mohamed Hajri
Myriam Ayari
Zeineb Benzarti
Taieb Jomni
Rym Ennaifer

Abstract

Background: This study evaluates the REMIND score’s performance in predicting postoperative Crohn’s disease recurrence compared to the Rutgeerts score, which has the limitation of grouping anastomotic and neo-terminal ileal lesions together with equal prognostic value.
Methods: We conducted a monocentric, retrospective, evaluative study of patients operated for Crohn’s disease. All patients had a follow-up colonoscopy within one year of surgery. Clinical relapse was defined by the Crohn’s disease related symptoms or complications, such as intra-
abdominal collection or occlusion, or subsequent postoperative surgery. Data analysis was performed using SPSS.25.
Results: Eighty patients were included. Clinical recurrence-free survival was significantly shorter in patients with ileal lesions whatever their severity was I(1,2,3,4)A(x), compared with patients without ileal lesions I(0)A(x): p<0,001 and not significantly different between patients without
anastomotic lesions I(x)A(0) and patients with anastomotic lesions whatever their severity was I(x)A(1,2,3): p=0,2. However, patients with at least semicircumferential anastomotic ulcerations A(2,3) had more anastomotic occlusive complications than patients classified A0 or A1: A0 VS A2 p=0,01 A0 VS A3 p<0,001 A0 VS A1 p=0,9. The I(x) score, compared with the Rutgeerts and A(x) scores, had the best values in terms of discriminative capacity (Area under the curve= 0,83 VS 0,73 VS 0,61), monotonicity (linearity test χ2 of 26,77 VS 12,36 VS 3,89), and homogeneity (likelihood ratio χ2 of 33,91 vs 18,45 VS 5,49).
Conclusion: The I(x) score outperformed both the Rutgeerts and A(x) scores in predicting postoperative recurrence. Consequently, evaluating ileal and anastomotic lesions separately provides a more accurate assessment of endoscopic recurrence

Keywords:

Crohn's disease, Surgery, Recurrence, Rutgeerts score, Endoscopy, REMIND score

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

References

  1. Nguyen GC, Loftus EV, Hirano I, Falck–Ytter Y, Singh S, Sultan S, et al. American Gastroenterological Association Institute Guideline
  2. on the Management of Crohn’s Disease After Surgical Resection. Gastroenterology. jan 2017;152(1):271-5.
  3. Frolkis AD, Dykeman J, Negrón ME, deBruyn J, Jette N, Fiest KM, et al. Risk of Surgery for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases Has Decreased
  4. Over Time: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Population- Based Studies. Gastroenterology. nov 2013;145(5):996-1006.
  5. Peyrin-Biroulet L, Loftus EV, Colombel JF, Sandborn WJ. The Natural History of Adult Crohn’s Disease in Population-Based Cohorts.
  6. American Journal of Gastroenterology. feb 2010;105(2):289-97.
  7. Rutgeerts P, Geboes K, Vantrappen G, Kerremans R, Coenegrachts JL, Coremans G. Natural history of recurrent Crohn’s disease at
  8. the ileocolonic anastomosis after curative surgery. Gut. 1 june 1984;25(6):665-72.
  9. Rutgeerts P, Geboes K, Vantrappen G, Beyls J, Kerremans R, Hiele M. Predictability of the postoperative course of Crohn’s disease.
  10. Gastroenterology. oct 1990;99(4):956-63.
  11. Hammoudi N, Auzolle C, Tran Minh ML, Boschetti G, Bezault M, Buisson A, et al. Postoperative Endoscopic Recurrence on the
  12. Neoterminal Ileum But Not on the Anastomosis Is Mainly Driving Long-Term Outcomes in Crohn’s Disease. Am J Gastroenterol. july
  13. ;115(7):1084-93.
  14. Chari ST, Keate RF. Ileocolonic Anastomotic Ulcers: A Case Series and Review of The Literature. American Journal of Gastroenterology.
  15. may 2000;95(5):1239-43.
  16. Fusaro F, Tambucci R, Romeo E, Bagolan P, Dall’Oglio L, Ceccarelli S, et al. Anastomotic ulcers in short bowel syndrome: New
  17. suggestions from a multidisciplinary approach. Journal of Pediatric Surgery. march 2018;53(3):483-8.