Twelve-month retention of technical skills in basic life support following simulation- based training among paramedical staff

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Héla Ben Turkia
Hanene Ghazali
Youssef Ebn Ebrahim
Syrine Keskes
Raja Fadhel
Sami Souissi

Abstract

Introduction: Simulation-based training is recognized as an effective educational strategy for acquiring clinical competencies, particularly among paramedical personnel. However, long-term retention of these skills remains insufficiently studied.
The aim was to assess the 12-month retention of technical skills in basic life support (BLS) following initial simulation-based training among paramedical staff.
Methods: We conducted a 12-month, single-center prospective study including 17 paramedicals working in an emergency department. Participants underwent a theoretical pre-test and an initial practical assessment of BLS skills (chest compressions and bag-valve-mask ventilation), followed by procedural simulation training. Knowledge and technical skills were evaluated immediately post-training (T1) and at 12 months (T2), using a standardized checklist scored out of 15.
Results: inclusion of 36 participants, 17 achieved all steps. Mean theoretical scores improved from 7.24±2.15 at baseline to 11.75±5.55 immediately after training (p=0.013), reaching 12.28±3.77 at 12 months. Practical skill scores significantly increased from 4.17±1.34 at baseline to 12.52±1.34 at T1 (p<0.001), with a mean score of 11.14±1.95 at T2, indicating substantial skill retention.
Conclusion: Our findings demonstrate sustained retention of both theoretical knowledge and technical skills in BLS at 12 months following simulation-based training among paramedical personnel. These results support the long-term educational value of simulation in enhancing emergency response capabilities within this population. However, a slight decline in performance at 12 months highlights the need for refresher training sessions.

Keywords:

Simulation, Pedagogy, Skills, Nurses

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

References

  1. Okuda Y, Bryson EO, DeMaria S, Jacobson L, Quinones J, Shen B, et al. The utility of simulation in medical education: what is the
  2. evidence? Mt Sinai J Med. août 2009;76(4):330-43.
  3. Ghazali H, Ouaness I, Zaouch K, Hamed R, Ines C, Manai H. Skill retention following simulation learning in acute coronary syndrome
  4. versus cardiac arrest. Tunis Med. 1 july 2022;100(7). Disponible sur: https://latunisiemedicale.com/index.php/tunismed/article
  5. view/4151
  6. Bahri B, Ghazali H, Sedghieni I, Zoubli A, kilani M,Kharraz T et al. Simulation learning in the emergency department: Impact on
  7. VideoLaryngoscope Intubation Skills. Tunis Med. 1 Aug 2025;103(8) :956-60. Disponible sur: https://latunisiemedicale.com/index.php/
  8. tunismed/article/view/5167
  9. Junli A, Isa SNI, Ibrahim FS. Factors of cardiopulmonary resuscitation skills retention among healthcare providers: A scoping review.
  10. Nurse Educ Pract. mai 2023;69:103617.
  11. Alshehri FD, Jones S, Harrison D. The effectiveness of high-fidelity simulation on undergraduate nursing students’ clinical reasoning-
  12. related skills: A systematic review. Nurse Educ Today. févr 2023;121:105679.
  13. Dessieux T, Estebe JP, Bloc S, Mercadal L, Ecoffey C. [Evaluation of the learning curve of residents in localizing a phantom target with
  14. ultrasonography]. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. oct 2008;27(10):797-801.
  15. Biau DJ, Porcher R. A method for monitoring a process from an out of control to an in control state: Application to the learning curve.
  16. Stat Med. 15 août 2010;29(18):1900-9.
  17. Yeung J, Djarv T, Hsieh MJ, Sawyer T, Lockey A, Finn J, et al. Spaced learning versus massed learning in resuscitation - A systematic
  18. review. Resuscitation. nov 2020;156:61-71.
  19. Anderson R, Sebaldt A, Lin Y, Cheng A. Optimal training frequency for acquisition and retention of high-quality CPR skills: A randomized
  20. trial. Resuscitation. févr 2019;135:153-61.
  21. Sutton RM, Niles D, Meaney PA, Aplenc R, French B, Abella BS, et al. Low-dose, high-frequency CPR training improves skill retention of
  22. in-hospital pediatric providers. Pediatrics. juill 2011;128(1):e145-151.
  23. Wik L, Myklebust H, Auestad BH, Steen PA. Retention of basic life support skills 6 months after training with an automated
  24. voice advisory manikin system without instructor involvement. Resuscitation. mars 2002;52(3):273-9.
  25. Nicolau A, Jorge I, Vieira-Marques P, Sa-Couto C. Influence of Training With Corrective Feedback Devices on Cardiopulmonary
  26. Resuscitation Skills Acquisition and Retention: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. JMIR Med Educ. 19 déc 2024;10:e59720.
  27. Ghatasheh A, Saleh MN, Jebbeh RA, AL-Quraan S, Elshaer AA, Almzayen M. The Effectiveness of Feedback-Integrated and
  28. Traditional Adult Basic Life Support Training Methods on Knowledge and Skills Retention Among Healthcare Providers in Clinical Settings:
  29. A Systematic Review. Palestinian Medical and Pharmaceutical Journal (Pal Med Pharm J). 5 avr 2025;11(3):None-None.
  30. Yeung J, Djarv T, Hsieh MJ, Sawyer T, Lockey A, Finn J, et al. Spaced learning versus massed learning in resuscitation – A systematic
  31. review. Resuscitation. 2020;156:61–71.
  32. Anderson R, Sebaldt A, Lin Y, Cheng A. Optimal training frequency for acquisition and retention of high-quality CPR skills: A randomized
  33. trial. Resuscitation. 2019;135:153–61
  34. Sutton RM, Niles D, Meaney PA, Aplenc R, French B, Abella BS, et al. Low-dose, high-frequency CPR training improves skill retention of in-hospital pediatric providers. Pediatrics. 2011;128(1):e145–151