Evaluating the Tunisian 'Access Program' for Innovative Therapies: Stakeholder Perspectives and Operational Recommendations

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Myriam Bizid
Rania Ben Hammamia
Yosra Berrazaga
Feten Chelly
Alia Hajem
Ahlem Ayed
Nouha Denguir
Zeineb Enneb
Mariem Hached
Rabeb Lajnef
Dorra Jarraya
Hajer Felfel

Abstract

Introduction: Access to innovative medicines is a major challenge in middle-income countries, where budgetary constraints and social inequalities hinder therapeutic equity. In response to the exclusion of indigent patients not covered by the National Health Insurance Fund (CNAM), the
Tunisian Ministry of Health launched the Access Program in 2015. This initiative is based on the donation of innovative drugs by pharmaceutical companies, in partnership with public hospitals. Its objective is to provide free access to high-cost treatments for severe conditions such as cancer
and autoimmune diseases.
Aim: To assess the program's functioning based on the experiences of its beneficiaries and operational stakeholders.
Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional survey was conducted between August and December 2024 in two hospitals (Mongi Slim La Marsa and Abderrahmen Mami Ariana).
A total of 50 patients, 22 prescribing clinicians, 4 hospital pharmacists, and 5 representatives from the pharmaceutical industry participated in the survey.
Results: Among the patients surveyed, 52% reported access-related difficulties, including stock shortages, prolonged delivery delays (with waiting times of 1 to 3 months reported by 40% of patients and estimated by 91% of prescribing clinicians). and geographic remoteness. Statistical analysis revealed a significant association between these barriers and overall patient satisfaction with the Access Program (p < 0.001): the more difficult
the access, the lower the level of satisfaction. In addition, healthcare professionals emphasized the lack of formalized protocols and limited stock visibility, while pharmaceutical companies highlighted the absence of post-distribution follow-up mechanisms.
Conclusion: The Access Program ....(abstract truncated at 250 words).

Keywords:

Access to medicines, innovative therapies, geographic disparities, indigent patients, pharmaceutical donations

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

References

  1. Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Economiques. Études économiques de l'OCDE Tunisie 2022. Paris: OCDE; 2022
  2. Ismaïl S, Arfa C. Effects of out-of-pocket medicine's spending on catastrophic expenditure and impoverishment in Tunisia. Value
  3. Health Reg Issues. 2022;30(1):109-18.
  4. Direction de la Pharmacie et du Médicament. Procédure interne de suivi et de gestion des Access Programs. Tunis: DPM; 2015
  5. Medicines Patent Pool. Annual Report 2022: Greater access to medicines and health technologies for those who need them.
  6. Geneva: MPP; 2023
  7. Umeh CA, Garcia Gonzalez P. Tremblay D, LaingR. The survival of patients enrolled in a global direct-to-patient cancer medicine
  8. donation program: The Glivec International Patient Assistance Program (GIPAP) EClinicalMedicine. 2020;19(1):e100257
  9. Bogart LM, Shazi Z, MacCarthy S, Mendoza Graf A, WaraNJ, Zionts D, et al. Implementation of South Africa's central chronic
  10. medicine dispensing and distribution program for HIV treatment: A qualitative evaluation. AIDS Behav. 2022;26(8):2600-12.
  11. Dash A. Assessment of patient satisfaction with generic medication in an Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for emerging economy using the Medication. J Patient Exp. 2021;8(1):1-6.
  12. Fentie AM, Mekonen ZT, Gizachew Z, Hailemariam M, Clark SM, Richardson J, et al. Chemotherapy supply chain management,
  13. safe handing and disposal in Ethiopia: The case of Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital. Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2023;40(3):258-66.
  14. Mendes Da Silva R, CactanoR. ""Farmacia Popular do Brasip" Program: characterization and evolution between 2004 and 2012.
  15. Cien Saude Colet. 2015;20(10):2943-56.
  16. Colon C, Salas P. Diaz M, Cotto R, Martinez I, Hale GM, etal. Patient assistance programs and technology in medication adherence.
  17. Innov Pharm. 2020;11(2):e3269.
  18. Graboyes EM, Chaiyachati KH, Gall JS, Johnson W, Krishnan JA, McManus SS, et al. Addressing transportation insecurity among
  19. patients with cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2023;115(3):229-38
  20. Pringle S, Ko EM, Doherty M, Bodurtha Smith AJ. Addressing transportation barriers in oncology: existing programs and new
  21. solutions. Support Care Cancer. 2024;32(5):317-9.
  22. Novartis Patient Assistance Foundation Novartis Patient Assistance Foundation Program [En Ligne]. 2025 Disponible sur: https://pap.
  23. novartis.com/
  24. Mwencha M, Rosen JE. Better data visibility & data use result in lower cost and improved performance in medicine supply chains
  25. [En Ligne]. 2016 [consulté le 22/06/2025] Disponible sur tpe/ww researchgate.neu/publication/30874079
  26. Mubiligi JM, Hedt Gauthier BL, Mpunga T, Tapela N, Okao P, Harries AD, et al. Caring for patients with surgically resectable cancers:
  27. experience from a specialised centre in rural Rwanda. Public Health Action. 2014:4(2):128-32.
  28. Emmerick IC, Do Nascimento JM, Pereira MA, Luiza VL, Ross Degnan D. Farmacia popular program: Changes in geographic accessibility of medicines during ten years of a medicine subsidy policy in Brazil. J Pharm Policy Pract. 2015;8(1):1-10.
  29. Toumi M, Zard J, Duvillard R, Jommi C. Medicaments innovants et contrats d'accès au marché.Ann Pharm Fr. 2013;71(5):302-12.
  30. Oldfield L, Penm J, Moles R. Exploring access to essential medicines in the South Pacific: insights from a multi-country cross-sectional
  31. study. Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2025;54(1):e101262.