Non-urgent consultations in polyvalent emergency department: proportion and contributing factors

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Fatma Hebaieb
Yousra Ayachi
Imen Naggara
Saloua Houimli
Jihène Sahli

Abstract

I


Introduction:Overcrowding in emergency departments (EDs) is a concerning global problem with negative repercussions for patients and caregivers. It is partly due to non-urgent consultations. The aims of our study wereto determine the proportion of non-urgent ED visits and to identify factorsassociated.


Methods: Cross-sectional study with an analytical aim including patients aged over 15 years consulted a polyvalent ED during14-day period. Consultations were coded from 1 to 5 according to the Clinical Classification of Emergency Patients (CCMU). We compared 2 groups: group 1 with urgent consultation (CCMU 3,4 and 5) and group 2 with non-urgent consultation (classified CCMU 1 and 2).


Results: N= 589, mean age=42years with a female predominance (54.5%). Group 1 included 149 patients and the second Group 440 patients (74.7%). Patients were significantly younger in group 2 and 60.8% had social security coverage (p=0.006). Reasons that motivated the EDvisitwereproximity, search for a quick solution and ignorance of the appropriate health facility to attend (p<0.05). Independent factors of non-urgent ED visit were single status, self-referral to the ED, perception of the symptom as not severe, no attending physician, no history of similar symptoms, search for a quick solution, and patient-perceived need for further investigations.


Conclusion:Easy access to investigations in EDs leads patients to consult them for non-urgent reasons. Better communication between them and basic health centers is recommended for the management of patients in CCMU 1 and 2 to avoid ED overload.

Keywords:

Emergency Medical Services, Referral and Consultation, Ambulatory Care Facilities, non-urgent , Factors

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

References

  1. Ben Gobrane, HL, Aounallah-Skhiri H, Ben Hamida A, et al. Motifs du recours aux services d’urgence des principaux hôpitaux du Grand Tunis. East Mediterr Health J. 2012 ; 01(01) :56-65.
  2. Gentile S, Durand AC, Bongiovanni I, Rofritsch S. Les consultants des services d’urgence relevant de la médecine générale: analyse de nouveaux comportements de santé. J Eur Urgences. 2007;20(1):138.
  3. Muller MP, Carter E, Siddiqui N, Larson E. Hand Hygiene Compliance in an Emergency Department: The Effect of Crowding. Acad Emerg Med Off J Soc Acad Emerg Med. 2015;22(10):1218-1221.
  4. Handel DA, Fu R, Vu E, et al. Association of emergency department and hospital characteristics with elopements and length of stay. J Emerg Med. 2014;46(6):839-846.
  5. Kulstad EB, Sikka R, Sweis RT, Kelley KM, Rzechula KH. ED overcrowding is associated with an increased frequency of medication errors. Am J Emerg Med. 2010 ;28(3) :304-309.
  6. Berraho M, Boly A, Tachfouti N, Elmajjaoui A, Nejjari C. Les consultations non appropriées aux services des urgences : étude dans un hôpital provincial au Maroc. Prat Organ Soins. 2012 ;43(3) :197.
  7. Miró Ò, Antonio MT, Jiménez S, et al. Decreased health care quality associated with emergency department overcrowding. Eur J Emerg Med. 1999;6(2):105-107.
  8. Sprivulis PC, Da Silva J, Jacobs IG, Frazer ARL, Jelinek GA. The association between hospital overcrowding and mortality among patients admitted via Western Australian emergency departments. Med J Aust. 2006;184(12):616-616.
  9. Afilal M, Yalaoui F, Dugardin F, Amodeo L, Laplanche D, Blua P. Forecasting the Emergency Department Patients Flow. J Med Syst. 2016;40(7):175.
  10. Shah NM, Shah MA, Behbehani J. Predictors of non-urgent utilization of hospital emergency services in Kuwait. Soc Sci Med 1982. 1996 ;42(9) :1313-1323.
  11. Galobardes B, Morabia A, Bernstein M. Statut socio-économique: un facteur de risque indépendant. Medecine Et Hygiene 2000;58:1910–3
  12. Carret MLV, Fassa ACG, Domingues MR. Inappropriate use of emergency services: a systematic review of prevalence and associated factors. Cad Saúde Pública. 2009; 25(1):7 28.
  13. Alnasser S, Alharbi M, AAlibrahim A, Aal Ibrahim A, Kentab O, Alassaf W et al. Analysis of Emergency Department Use by Non-Urgent Patients and Their Visit Characteristics at an Academic Center. Int J Gen Med. 2023; 20(1):221-232.
  14. Abdallat AM, al-Smadi I, Abbadi MD. Who usesthe emergency room services? Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal 2000;6:1126–1129
  15. Naouri D, Ranchon G, Vuagnat A, et al. Factors associated with inappropriate use of emergency departments: findings from a cross-sectional national study in France. BMJ Qual Saf. 2020 ; 29(6) :449-464.
  16. Pereira S, e Silva AO, Quintas M, et al. Appropriateness of emergency department visits in a Portuguese University hospital. Ann Emerg Med. 2001;37(6):580-586.
  17. Gertman PM, Restuccia JD. The appropriateness evaluation protocol: a technique for assessing unnecessary days of hospital care. Med Care. 1981;19(8):855-871.
  18. Cash E, Cash R, Ducassé J-L, Hault C, Matthieu F, Richard T. Enquête qualitative préalable à la définition d’une enquête nationale sur les urgences hospitalières [Internet]. DREES, Document de travail, série Etudes et Recherche; 2013 [cité 14 févr 2025]. Disponible sur: http://rgdoi.net/10.13140/RG.2.1.4658.0969
  19. Launay C, Haubois G, Hureaux-Huynh R, Gautier J, Annweiler C, Beauchet O. Older adults and emergency department: who is at risk of hospitalization? Gériatrie Psychol Neuropsychiatr Viellissement. 2014;12(1):43-49.
  20. Padgett DK, Brodsky B. Psychosocial factors influencing non-urgent use of the emergency room: a review of the literature and recommendations for research and improved service delivery. Soc Sci Med 1982. 1992;35(9):1189-1197.
  21. Coster JE, Turner JK, Bradbury D, Cantrell A. Why Do People Choose Emergency and Urgent Care Services? A Rapid Review Utilizing a Systematic Literature Search and Narrative Synthesis. Theodoro DL, éditeur. Acad Emerg Med. 2017;24(9):1137 49.
  22. Sarver JH, Cydulka RK, Baker DW. Usual source of care and nonurgent emergency department use. Acad Emerg Med Off J Soc Acad Emerg Med. 2002;9(9):916-923.
  23. Gamper G, Wiedermann W, Barisonzo R, Stockner I, Wiedermann CJ. Inappropriate hospital admission: interaction between patient age and co-morbidity. Intern Emerg Med. 2011;6(4):361-367.
  24. Billings J, Parikh N, Mijanovich T. Emergency department use in New York City: a substitute for primary care? Issue Brief Commonw Fund. 2000;(433):1-5.
  25. Afilalo J, Marinovich A, Afilalo M, et al. Nonurgent emergency department patient characteristics and barriers to primary care. Acad Emerg Med Off J Soc Acad Emerg Med. 2004;11(12):1302-1310.
  26. Coleman P. Will alternative immediate care services reduce demands for non-urgent treatment at accident and emergency? Emerg Med J. 2001;18(6):482-487.
  27. Carret MLV, Fassa AG, Kawachi I. Demand for emergency health service: factors associated with inappropriate use. BMC Health Serv Res. 2007; 7:131.
  28. Petersen LA, Burstin HR, O’Neil AC, Orav EJ, Brennan TA. Nonurgent Emergency Department Visits: The Effect of Having a Regular Doctor. Med Care. 1998;36(8):1249 55.
  29. Oh H, Chow W, Gao Y, Tiah L, Goh S, Mohan T. Factors associated with inappropriate attendances at the emergency department of a tertiary hospital in Singapore. Singapore Med J. 2020;61(2):75 80.
  30. Miyazawa A, Maeno T, Shaku F, et al. Inappropriate use of the emergency department for nonurgent conditions: Patient characteristics and associated factors at a Japanese hospital. J Gen Fam Med. 2019;20(4):146-153.
  31. Oterino D, Peiró S, Calvo R, Sutil P, Fernández O, Pérez G, et al. Utilización inadecuada de un servicio de urgencias hospitalario. Una evaluación con criterios explícitos. Gac Sanit. 1999;13(5):361 70.